General Discussion

Decent pulls... All my S and A recent pulls

15557596061

Comments

  • NinjaDesignzNinjaDesignz Member Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Lol i just did excactly the same and got this minutes ago. guess we catched the Audi giveaway (randomness?) :)

    You probably won't get to use it anyways lol. I have 2 and they collect dust
  • grandvachegrandvache Member Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 24
    This from German premiums made me happy enough ($1.5)

    This from a ceramic made me ecstatic!


  • lg29lg29 Member Posts: 670 ✭✭✭✭
    This from German premiums made me happy enough ($1.5)

    This from a ceramic made me ecstatic!


    Those C class RUFs are going to be fuego
  • TD42792TD42792 Member Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭✭✭
    lg29 said:
    This from German premiums made me happy enough ($1.5)

    This from a ceramic made me ecstatic!


    Those C class RUFs are going to be fuego
    The RUF is on fire
  • starpino77starpino77 Member Posts: 43 ✭✭
    I've found this monster. Any idea how to max?

  • AntounAntoun Member Posts: 1,134 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've found this monster. Any idea how to max?

    I would go 303, but try to test MRA before finishing it this way.
  • grandvachegrandvache Member Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This from German premiums made me happy enough ($1.5)

    This from a ceramic made me ecstatic!


    I'm also thinking that the i8 should be on STD tyres as it runs eco-rubber.  I can't find the actual OEM tyres, does anyone know?  It would be a beast in the rain if it was.
  • starpino77starpino77 Member Posts: 43 ✭✭
    Antoun said:
    I've found this monster. Any idea how to max?

    I would go 303, but try to test MRA before finishing it this way.
    Updated 2.3 2.0 2.3 does 0-100 in 7.79s.
  • S3XYS3XY Member Posts: 319 ✭✭✭

    mra 71.4
  • NinjaDesignzNinjaDesignz Member Posts: 1,878 ✭✭✭✭✭
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    Soooo it's basically a potato 
  • S3XYS3XY Member Posts: 319 ✭✭✭
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    Soooo it's basically a potato 
    Yeah. rq27 might be accurate to describe how bad it is.
    The only use of this car I can imagine is to scare opponents away, but it needs to be accompanied by some other Legendaries.
  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Member Posts: 244 ✭✭✭
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
  • DING097DING097 Member Posts: 36
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
  • lg29lg29 Member Posts: 670 ✭✭✭✭
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

  • TD42792TD42792 Member Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph
  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Member Posts: 244 ✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
  • TD42792TD42792 Member Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Member Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
  • bluedogsnoopbluedogsnoop Member Posts: 499 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LittleEnosBurdette said

    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
    Yes
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Member Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Got it then. 👍🏻
  • BoxtaSBoxtaS Member Posts: 1,311 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What is the Twizy’s MRA? Zero? 
    Or infinity? 
  • evilprofesseurevilprofesseur Member Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
    ..you're not talking about the BTR anymore, right? It can't possibly make the 0-100 in 6s, even when maxed, can it?
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Member Posts: 2,610 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
    ..you're not talking about the BTR anymore, right? It can't possibly make the 0-100 in 6s, even when maxed, can it?
    Sorry no I wasn’t, was just checking how it was done. 


  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Member Posts: 244 ✭✭✭
    edited June 27
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37

    Oh oh i just found maybe a flaw in this formula?

    How can you multiply and divide decimal numbers with non-decimal time numbers (seconds in particular)? When you multiply or divide the outcome you get is always decimal.

    I really dont get it, so the MRA value is just a vague number that shows the power of the car from 60-100mph? Cause its sure not seconds.

    Because when you divide lets say 500 with 6.50seconds the outcome is what? If you do this on a calculator it will take 6.50 as SIX POINT FIVE which is 6 and a half. But this is not the case cause 6.50 is 6 seconds and 50 tenths of second...
  • RWareRWare Member Posts: 283 ✭✭✭
    Sorry, I may have misunderstood, but 6.50 seconds is 6 and a half.

    5 tenths of a second is .5, which is half, right?
  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Member Posts: 244 ✭✭✭
    RWare said:
    Sorry, I may have misunderstood, but 6.50 seconds is 6 and a half.

    5 tenths of a second is .5, which is half, right?
    Ohhh you are absolutely right, it is indeed because its a tenth!
    I was totally confused because time is not measured in decimals from minutes and up, but it is measured in decimals on seconds and below.

    So you actually can multiply 100*6.3 seconds or divide 500/6.2.
  • evilprofesseurevilprofesseur Member Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Anzatoro said:
    RWare said:
    Sorry, I may have misunderstood, but 6.50 seconds is 6 and a half.

    5 tenths of a second is .5, which is half, right?
    Ohhh you are absolutely right, it is indeed because its a tenth!
    I was totally confused because time is not measured in decimals from minutes and up, but it is measured in decimals on seconds and below.

    So you actually can multiply 100*6.3 seconds or divide 500/6.2.
    Using this definition mra is a unitless value
Sign In or Register to comment.