Do not sell. There's an error with this one, apparently it should be AWD at least and I'm sure someone suggested a chunk more powerful.
Seriousy?They don't make mistakes.Or they never said they made one...It's really sad.Why can't Hutch tell to their loyal players...Yeee we againg **** it up...again and say sorry?All this cars corrections and wrong stats shoudn't ever appear in car game like this.Sorry to say it but your car knowledge are very small.Then we players pointing out your stupid mistakes with hope you correct them.If correct any it takes months to get it rigth.Then new car update is comming with another wrong stats...Seriousy?
Unfortunately, all of the D class USA "Drag" cars I have pulled thus far have been underwhelming. Stock vs stock, they have all been significantly slower than the RQ12, '70 Monte Carlo (and 396 'Vette, ofcourse). Haven't found any MRA gems yet.. Thanks to @Nacho101 for listing those times btw.
Also, and maybe I am missing something here, but why is this '03 Monte Carlo SS listed as RWD? They added the '91 Lumina Z34 as RWD too. Neither of those gens released any RWD models, IIRC.I've driven that particular Jeff Gordon "moar stickers" edition. It came optioned with an N/A 3800 (series 1), attached to that terrible slushbox automatic driving the front wheels.
A little off topic, but I dig this new pic of the '03 Jag XJR. I don't remember the old pic, but I want to keep it now just because it looks so slick!
Do not sell. There's an error with this one, apparently it should be AWD at least and I'm sure someone suggested a chunk more powerful.
Seriousy?They don't make mistakes.Or they never said they made one...It's really sad.Why can't Hutch tell to their loyal players...Yeee we againg **** it up...again and say sorry?All this cars corrections and wrong stats shoudn't ever appear in car game like this.Sorry to say it but your car knowledge are very small.Then we players pointing out your stupid mistakes with hope you correct them.If correct any it takes months to get it rigth.Then new car update is comming with another wrong stats...Seriousy?
I guess hutch will finally change its name instead of stats
Got the same car yesterday, going to fuse it up to 3.0/3.0/3.0 just for the hell of it... It's completely useless as it is though. Worse than even the QX50.
Unfortunately, all of the D class USA "Drag" cars I have pulled thus far have been underwhelming. Stock vs stock, they have all been significantly slower than the RQ12, '70 Monte Carlo (and 396 'Vette, ofcourse). Haven't found any MRA gems yet.. Thanks to @Nacho101 for listing those times btw.
Also, and maybe I am missing something here, but why is this '03 Monte Carlo SS listed as RWD? They added the '91 Lumina Z34 as RWD too. Neither of those gens released any RWD models, IIRC.I've driven that particular Jeff Gordon "moar stickers" edition. It came optioned with an N/A 3800 (series 1), attached to that terrible slushbox automatic driving the front wheels.
A little off topic, but I dig this new pic of the '03 Jag XJR. I don't remember the old pic, but I want to keep it now just because it looks so slick!
And the Monte Carlo and the Lumina to the incorrect car stats page.
Unfortunately, all of the D class USA "Drag" cars I have pulled thus far have been underwhelming. Stock vs stock, they have all been significantly slower than the RQ12, '70 Monte Carlo (and 396 'Vette, ofcourse). Haven't found any MRA gems yet.. Thanks to @Nacho101 for listing those times btw.
Also, and maybe I am missing something here, but why is this '03 Monte Carlo SS listed as RWD? They added the '91 Lumina Z34 as RWD too. Neither of those gens released any RWD models, IIRC.I've driven that particular Jeff Gordon "moar stickers" edition. It came optioned with an N/A 3800 (series 1), attached to that terrible slushbox automatic driving the front wheels.
A little off topic, but I dig this new pic of the '03 Jag XJR. I don't remember the old pic, but I want to keep it now just because it looks so slick!
Well, it's no money to speak of, and who knows what the stats will end up looking like (if they ever change it)?
It looks like Dodge is selling it as a quarter mile drag racing speed machine, so it's not unthinkable that Hutch might nerf the handling on it from what it is now, in which case maybe 996 will be the way to go in the game. If, if, if..
@mikes; Don't mod me bro! Lol jk. Thanks for the heads up, I must have missed that thread. I'll put the relevant info into the correct thread this time!
@TGPD; Ahh, I remember now. That was bothering me for some odd reason. Thanks mate.
Any info on this one? Not sure whether to go for 332 or 323. Top speed is not that good and handling should probably be around 80 when fully upgraded, so maybe 323?
@StealthFT; I'm not sure if I would go 330, or 303 on that truck.. But it does look strong and I'm hoping to pull it. Wonder how it does stock vs stock on a few tracks compared to the S10 XstreeEEEEeeme?
@StealthFT; 311? 3.0 1.3 1.3? Leave it at that if you want and I'll PM you when I have the Xstreme at your same level. That should give you an idea of what tune would be best for the 454 SS, in comparison.
Looks like the Xstreme's optimal tune should be a safe bet @ 303, but maybe both are. I'm just wondering if that 454 SS @330 would be a great asphalt Hill climber.
Are most of you guys still opening USA premiums for these C(+) class cars? I really wanna bite the bullet on some, but I'm too cheap with my hard smarfed money..
Any of these stand out as must keeps? Bear in mind Leonie has been busily upgrading all the blues for me so they’re at varying stages of 1st fusion levels (none are stock).
Any of these stand out as must keeps? Bear in mind Leonie has been busily upgrading all the blues for me so they’re at varying stages of 1st fusion levels (none are stock).
Any of these stand out as must keeps? Bear in mind Leonie has been busily upgrading all the blues for me so they’re at varying stages of 1st fusion levels (none are stock).
Do you mind running the charger in drag races?
Stock Charger runs (all asphalt dry, standing for 1/4, 1/2 and 1 mile)
Comments
Also, and maybe I am missing something here, but why is this '03 Monte Carlo SS listed as RWD? They added the '91 Lumina Z34 as RWD too. Neither of those gens released any RWD models, IIRC.
A little off topic, but I dig this new pic of the '03 Jag XJR. I don't remember the old pic, but I want to keep it now just because it looks so slick!
anyone tried this one?
seems like good option for wet hairpins, city streets and fast circuits and since new update changed slalom this one could be the best on it
It looks like Dodge is selling it as a quarter mile drag racing speed machine, so it's not unthinkable that Hutch might nerf the handling on it from what it is now, in which case maybe 996 will be the way to go in the game. If, if, if..
@TGPD; Ahh, I remember now. That was bothering me for some odd reason. Thanks mate.
Looks like the Xstreme's optimal tune should be a safe bet @ 303, but maybe both are. I'm just wondering if that 454 SS @330 would be a great asphalt Hill climber.
@NinjaDesignz Not sure if you caught these.
Looks like a good hill climber for 70s or not?