General Discussion

Update 7.0 Car Discussion

145791013

Comments

  • binnerbinner Member Posts: 541 ✭✭✭✭
    Livin the American Dream in my PT Cruiser 😎
  • Chris1775Chris1775 Member Posts: 324 ✭✭✭✭
    Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial
    the picture is nice tho...
  • grandvachegrandvache Member Posts: 1,944 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Chris1775 said:
    Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial
    the picture is nice tho...
    Old car, new picture, a bit of a heap too I'm afraid, I had one unused for the longest time, I ran it of desperation in the recent Chevy event and will fuse it without blinking at some point.
  • sinnersinner Member Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TGPD said:
    bobdylan said:

    That's me happy 
    Bet you're jealous.

    Well...
  • bobdylanbobdylan Member Posts: 3,443 ✭✭✭✭✭
    intresting ones , the 454ss has loads of torque  naff all power or top speed . God knows who at it will shine at but can't wait to find out
  • RobGripesRobGripes Member Posts: 2,222 ✭✭✭✭✭
    sinner said:
    TGPD said:
    bobdylan said:

    That's me happy 
    Bet you're jealous.

    Well...

    Dunno, the Corvette is way for stylish!
  • OzzmanOzzman Member Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭✭✭
    bobdylan said:
    intresting ones , the 454ss has loads of torque  naff all power or top speed . God knows who at it will shine at but can't wait to find out
    I've already maxed a Stealth, that one looks promising.
  • lg29lg29 Member Posts: 697 ✭✭✭✭
    TD01055 said:
    Doupao said:
    BoxtaS said:
    bobdylan said:
    12rq? This should be swift in a straight line
    I like the look of that too, and this: 

    that challenger us very bad
    This one better? Similar to other standard tyred cars but with a higher RQ. Better mid range?

    No that one is really slow to 60. I just pulled a plymouth barracuda fastback and it takes it around 5.3 seconds to 60. 
  • benhaha85benhaha85 Member Posts: 236 ✭✭✭


    Thoughts? Has higher 0-60 but better handling than the RQ18 CTS. Could be decent on tracks without long straights.
  • bobdylanbobdylan Member Posts: 3,443 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What do you do with a slow muscle car ??? Are they all food ... or do we care stray from the 330 and try a different  tune
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Member Posts: 2,739 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please? 
  • grandvachegrandvache Member Posts: 1,944 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please? 
    I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Member Posts: 2,739 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please? 
    I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
    What image is correct Martin? The IG pic is a mica red (not available in 93) GC8 UK ‘99 turbo 2000. 
  • grandvachegrandvache Member Posts: 1,944 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please? 
    I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
    What image is correct Martin? The IG pic is a mica red (not available in 93) GC8 UK ‘99 turbo 2000. 
    Fair point, the registration doesn't match the car year, I just meant that the picture is of a turbo 2000
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Member Posts: 2,739 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I’ve pointed out in the relevant pre update threads for months that this IG picture is incorrect, can it eventually be changed? At some point? Please? 
    I think the confusion arises because in the UK the WRX didn't exist, we had the turbo 2000, I'd need to check but the stats look right for that car, and the image is certainly correct.
    What image is correct Martin? The IG pic is a mica red (not available in 93) GC8 UK ‘99 turbo 2000. 
    Fair point, the registration doesn't match the car year, I just meant that the picture is of a turbo 2000
    The stats and title are correct for the more powerful Japanese WRX as close as I can make it out, just wrong picture. 
  • DabigpDabigp Member Posts: 604 ✭✭✭✭
    Worth maxing? It looks awesome in the picture...
  • HeissRodHeissRod Member Posts: 4,865 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Looks like a slightly slower Yukon.  I'd guess a 969 would end up at 6.0/83.
  • Chris1775Chris1775 Member Posts: 324 ✭✭✭✭
    Chris1775 said:
    Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial
    the picture is nice tho...
    Old car, new picture, a bit of a heap too I'm afraid, I had one unused for the longest time, I ran it of desperation in the recent Chevy event and will fuse it without blinking at some point.
    You are so right....silly me. It is an old car lol...I accomplished nothing, gathered food 😆 
  • Huskic69Huskic69 Member Posts: 1,853 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Chris1775 said:
    Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial
    the picture is nice tho...
    What used to be the old picture?
  • NinjaDesignzNinjaDesignz Member Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2018
    Huskic69 said:
    Chris1775 said:
    Pulled this thing....I was happy...but but but it’s an rq 23. I can run some times if u guys want. Doubt it will amount to anything especial
    the picture is nice tho...
    What used to be the old picture?
    The new picture reminds me a lot of NFS Hot Pursuit 2
  • JayJay Member Posts: 2,429 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Did I get lucky? 


  • UncleGaryUncleGary Member Posts: 193 ✭✭✭
    edited October 2018
    Jay said:
    Did I get lucky? 
    Got the same car yesterday, going to fuse it up to 3.0/3.0/3.0 just for the hell of it... It's completely useless as it is though. Worse than even the QX50.
  • grandvachegrandvache Member Posts: 1,944 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Jay said:
    Did I get lucky? 


    Do not sell.  There's an error with this one, apparently it should be AWD at least and I'm sure someone suggested a chunk more powerful.
  • Nacho101Nacho101 Member Posts: 467 ✭✭✭✭
    Twinkie said:
    So the 396 is 4 seconds faster on 0-100 than the other ones? Sure u got it right?

  • AJTheCaveManAJTheCaveMan Member Posts: 1,366 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Unfortunately, all of the D class USA "Drag" cars I have pulled thus far have been underwhelming. Stock vs stock, they have all been significantly slower than the RQ12, '70 Monte Carlo (and 396 'Vette, ofcourse). Haven't found any MRA gems yet.. Thanks to @Nacho101 for listing those times btw.

    Also, and maybe I am missing something here, but why is this '03 Monte Carlo SS listed as RWD? They added the '91 Lumina Z34 as RWD too. Neither of those gens released any RWD models, IIRC.I've driven that particular Jeff Gordon "moar stickers" edition. It came optioned with an N/A 3800 (series 1), attached to that terrible slushbox automatic driving the front wheels. 

    A little off topic, but I dig this new pic of the '03 Jag XJR. I don't remember the old pic, but I want to keep it now just because it looks so slick!
  • wheat0rwheat0r Member Posts: 561 ✭✭✭✭
    krystian said:
    Jay said:
    Did I get lucky? 


    Do not sell.  There's an error with this one, apparently it should be AWD at least and I'm sure someone suggested a chunk more powerful.
    Seriousy?They don't make mistakes.Or they never said they made one...It's really sad.Why can't Hutch tell to their loyal players...Yeee we againg **** it up...again and say sorry?All this cars corrections and wrong stats shoudn't ever appear in car game like this.Sorry to say it but your car knowledge are very small.Then we players pointing out your stupid mistakes with hope you correct them.If correct any it takes months to get it rigth.Then new car update is comming with another wrong stats...Seriousy? 
    I guess hutch will finally change its name instead of stats  :p
  • HeissRodHeissRod Member Posts: 4,865 ✭✭✭✭✭
    UncleGary said:
    Jay said:
    Did I get lucky? 
    Got the same car yesterday, going to fuse it up to 3.0/3.0/3.0 just for the hell of it... It's completely useless as it is though. Worse than even the QX50.
    Why would you waste a third fuse to 3.0?
Sign In or Register to comment.