Disagree. I think the requirements will be GE, but the prize car will be something from IR that we haven't had yet (ie. not Lamborghini). So Pagani, Lancia, Alfa Romeo or Maserati.
Disagree. I think the requirements will be GE, but the prize car will be something from IR that we haven't had yet (ie. not Lamborghini). So Pagani, Lancia, Alfa Romeo or Maserati.
(Actually, I don't know the Final requirements yet, but you're clearly on it with the prize)
So, the RQ29 1984 Lancia LC2. Let's put if up against the RQ29 1990 Mazda 787B and see what happens!
All times stock:
0-100mph LC2 5.20s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 108) 787B 5.50s (with a 0-60 of 2.8s, that makes a RKD MRA of 104)
So everyone who used all their gold on the 787B should have waited for this one 😂
I would be more interested in if it beats the 962C on anything.
Good question, let's check it:
All times stock:
0-100mph LC2 5.20s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 108) 787B 5.50s (with a 0-60 of 2.8s, that makes a RKD MRA of 104) 962 C 5.25s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 106)
1m drag LC2 24.67s 787B 25.43s 962 C 24.58s
Fast Circuit LC2 59.27s 787B 59.92s 962 C 59.42s
Twisty Circuit LC2 63.80s 787B 64.15s 962 C 63.85s
While the Lancia is a great car to win, these moneygrabbing schemes by Hutch really get tiring. What a joke to re-run the Mazda and release the Mazda Killer as next prizecar. This game does not even try to hide its priorities aymore, seems enough people buy CF no matter what.
Hutch your Titanium series or any other improvements on gameplay, its all about squeezing pockets. While it may be working business-wise i see more and more longtime players (and spenders) fade away, loose interest. But i guess there is enough fresh blood who will need some time to get to that experience, so yeah, heres some more "offers".
So everyone who used all their gold on the 787B should have waited for this one 😂
I would be more interested in if it beats the 962C on anything.
Good question, let's check it:
All times stock:
0-100mph LC2 5.20s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 108) 787B 5.50s (with a 0-60 of 2.8s, that makes a RKD MRA of 104) 962 C 5.25s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 106)
1m drag LC2 24.67s 787B 25.43s 962 C 24.58s
Fast Circuit LC2 59.27s 787B 59.92s 962 C 59.42s
Twisty Circuit LC2 63.80s 787B 64.15s 962 C 63.85s
So logically, the next prize car will be the XJR9, which will blow all of these out of the water
Trying out something a bit different for the benchmarks here.
In the second table, tracks are ordered from least to most twisty (roughly); all times are stock; times shaded red are those the 2015 Renault Sport R.S. 01 has the advantage. As you can see, with better handling but worse 0-60 and MRA than the RWD/Slick Legendary competition, things have to get pretty twisty for it to win. I also added in the Bugattis as possible competitors in French events:
Trying out something a bit different for the benchmarks here.
In the second table, tracks are ordered from least to most twisty (roughly); all times are stock; times shaded red are those the 2015 Renault Sport R.S. 01 has the advantage. As you can see, with better handling but worse 0-60 and MRA than the RWD/Slick Legendary competition, things have to get pretty twisty for it to win. I also added in the Bugattis as possible competitors in French events:
Looks like it beats an eb110ss and at 333 might beat a maxed banana, pretty nice to have for FR events
At this rate, what never would've been a prize car people would want, the Volvo is shaping up to be the most desired, possibly hottest contested car, well played lol
At this rate, what never would've been a prize car people would want, the Volvo is shaping up to be the most desired, possibly hottest contested car, well played lol
There's a few I'd want not for how good they are, but for the memories of either seeing them on tv "the Volvo" or owning it "the rover 220 coupe turbo"
Comments
It never is
The non-winner of this week's Tri-Series good guessing no-prize:
(Actually, I don't know the Final requirements yet, but you're clearly on it with the prize)
So, the RQ29 1984 Lancia LC2. Let's put if up against the RQ29 1990 Mazda 787B and see what happens!
All times stock:
0-100mph
LC2 5.20s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 108)
787B 5.50s (with a 0-60 of 2.8s, that makes a RKD MRA of 104)
1m drag
LC2 24.67s
787B 25.43s
Fast Circuit
LC2 59.27s
787B 59.92s
Twisty Circuit
LC2 63.80s
787B 64.15s
I would be more interested in if it beats the 962C on anything.
All times stock:
0-100mph
LC2 5.20s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 108)
787B 5.50s (with a 0-60 of 2.8s, that makes a RKD MRA of 104)
962 C 5.25s (with a 0-60 of 2.7s, that makes a RKD MRA of 106)
1m drag
LC2 24.67s
787B 25.43s
962 C 24.58s
Fast Circuit
LC2 59.27s
787B 59.92s
962 C 59.42s
Twisty Circuit
LC2 63.80s
787B 64.15s
962 C 63.85s
I was so happy to get the 787b, but soon it will get smashed...
In the second table, tracks are ordered from least to most twisty (roughly); all times are stock; times shaded red are those the 2015 Renault Sport R.S. 01 has the advantage. As you can see, with better handling but worse 0-60 and MRA than the RWD/Slick Legendary competition, things have to get pretty twisty for it to win. I also added in the Bugattis as possible competitors in French events:
No?
Ok 😭😭