Unbelievable results

13637394142

Comments

  • JaguarDTMJaguarDTM Posts: 324 ✭✭✭
    tbf rolling slalom is quite handling-heavy compared to normal slalom (weight isn't such a big factor) 
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 819 ✭✭✭
    JaguarDTM said:
    tbf rolling slalom is quite handling-heavy compared to normal slalom (weight isn't such a big factor) 
    Weight is always relevant. What is lot less relevant in rolling start?  0-60.

  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 538 ✭✭✭


    I was not expecting this one O-o especially on the car park...
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 819 ✭✭✭
    AslanV said:


    I was not expecting this one O-o especially on the car park...
    Next time you will remember. Car park is 969 dominant.
    969 time is 45:14 for example.
  • KrDalleKrDalle Posts: 454 ✭✭✭
    I feel sorry for those lancia owners...
    Plus some other strange results... 

  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 819 ✭✭✭
    edited June 23
    @KrDalle
    I dont see anything strange in those races.
    Red Pontiac doesnt have TC. obvious loss.
    And those Fast circuits ofc your cars won because of much better MRA.

    If car with better 0-60 and handling plus having 4WD is 2 RQ below, it screams that car is having very low MRA.
    Same Chrysler vs Dodge. MRA difference is too big, and obviosly it is visible why car with "worse" stats is 3 RQ higher.

  • KrDalleKrDalle Posts: 454 ✭✭✭
    edited June 23
    REALAIS said:
    @KrDalle
    I dont see anything strange in those races.
    Red Pontiac doesnt have TC. obvious loss.
    And those Fast circuits ofc your cars won because of much better MRA.

    If car with better 0-60 and handling plus having 4WD is 2 RQ below, it screams that car is having very low MRA.
    Same Chrysler vs Dodge. MRA difference is too big, and obviosly it is visible why car with "worse" stats is 3 RQ higher.

    Chrysler and dodge have the same engine, dodge weights less 😉
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 819 ✭✭✭
    @KrDalle and?
    It's game and numbers matters.
    Chrysler has 74 MRA
      Dodge  has 60 MRA

  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 538 ✭✭✭
    KrDalle said:
    REALAIS said:
    @KrDalle
    I dont see anything strange in those races.
    Red Pontiac doesnt have TC. obvious loss.
    And those Fast circuits ofc your cars won because of much better MRA.

    If car with better 0-60 and handling plus having 4WD is 2 RQ below, it screams that car is having very low MRA.
    Same Chrysler vs Dodge. MRA difference is too big, and obviosly it is visible why car with "worse" stats is 3 RQ higher.

    Chrysler and dodge have the same engine, dodge weights less 😉
    In real life. Guess there is an MRA investigation for
    @JackyQu

    But for the in game RELAIS is right 
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 538 ✭✭✭
    A little bit late, but this one caught me off-guard!







    Know than grip is important, but it can be that much difference no? 

    0-60 is under, weight is under..

    And i am not sure if the bonus for maxed engine is at work on dry 
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 819 ✭✭✭
    AslanV said:
    A little bit late, but this one caught me off-guard!







    Know than grip is important, but it can be that much difference no? 

    0-60 is under, weight is under..

    And i am not sure if the bonus for maxed engine is at work on dry 
    82 handling is from 81.5 up to 82.49. Seems both cars are at different corners if you got prompt with Handling info.
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 538 ✭✭✭
    Yep, but you still have the weight, and the 0-60... 

    But still surprising for me ^^
  • 0171801718 Posts: 447 ✭✭✭

    Unexpected, not unbelievable on a second Look. 
  • HeissRodHeissRod Posts: 6,931 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What is the tune of these cars?
  • 0171801718 Posts: 447 ✭✭✭
    HeissRod said:
    What is the tune of these cars?
    996 vs 987
  • SquadalaSquadala Posts: 190 ✭✭✭
    Good to know.

  • SquadalaSquadala Posts: 190 ✭✭✭
    Yeah ok.
  • HeissRodHeissRod Posts: 6,931 ✭✭✭✭✭
    lol.....the 650i weighs 578kg (1,274lb) more than the Z4.  Of course it can sling it's mass around a skidpad better.
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 538 ✭✭✭
    Squadala said:
    Good to know.

    How was the impala tuned ? One star is missing ! But thanks for the tip !
  • mario_mmario_m Posts: 155 ✭✭✭
     996 vs 969 hill climb sand.. info better mid range acceleration 🤬
  • AslanVAslanV Posts: 538 ✭✭✭
    Wut Oo I feel rip by the Hemi...

    Also
    How a supercar can be so close from a 4x4 while crossing a river ?

    Should be DNF !
  • milewski1015milewski1015 Posts: 2,205 ✭✭✭✭✭
    AslanV said:
    Wut Oo I feel rip by the Hemi...

    Also
    How a supercar can be so close from a 4x4 while crossing a river ?

    Should be DNF !
    The 2 points higher handling on the Hemi isn’t enough to make up for the 0.7 0-60 difference I think. 

    Agree about the river crossing. That should be a track where only high clearance cars don’t DNF
  • AndreasSimmerAndreasSimmer Posts: 1,790 ✭✭✭✭✭
    That Lancia is **** or offroad totally broken. Both disappointing.



  • BoxtaSBoxtaS Posts: 1,832 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Definitely something very wrong with the Delta S4. @Hutch_Dmitri
  • Hutch_DmitriHutch_Dmitri Posts: 94 admin
    BoxtaS said:
    Definitely something very wrong with the Delta S4. @Hutch_Dmitri
    Thanks for letting us know, I'll chat to the team at the earliest opportunity.
  • REALAISREALAIS Posts: 819 ✭✭✭
    Lancia vs maxed Porsche Dakar is bad comparision. 
    Ofc maxed car will win in Snow when ETB is at its strongest.
  • Gentox90Gentox90 Posts: 171 ✭✭✭
  • David_FookDavid_Fook Posts: 2,714 ✭✭✭✭✭
    REALAIS said:
    Lancia vs maxed Porsche Dakar is bad comparision. 
    Ofc maxed car will win in Snow when ETB is at its strongest.

    Just because we know about ETB doesn’t make this a bad comparison at all. The title of the thread is “unbelievable results”, which this is based on the card stats.

    maybe since Hutch is working on a ETB fix, they could use some of these results to show us the results of the change, whatever that is.
Sign In or Register to comment.