Man hutch gets so many things wrong initially it makes me wonder if they have any actual car guys on staff of if they are just all hybrid driving betas.
1994 Mercedes-Benz 500E (B50) -It should be slightly slower. I guess the data for this car is kinda rare. But luckily our Japanese buddy have did a 1/4 mile test on it. 1/4 mile: 14.13 -> 14.44 Source:
1994 Mercedes-Benz 500E (B50) -It should be slightly slower. I guess the data for this car is kinda rare. But luckily our Japanese buddy have did a 1/4 mile test on it. 1/4 mile: 14.13 -> 14.44 Source:
hopefully that will bump it down to super rare, i will no longer have the fear of getting it in my carbons
I know Automobile Catalog's acceleration estimations are pretty spot on most of the times, but it's not a viable source as it's still just an estimation.
And you clearly didn't read the announcement, either.
Pretty sure the magazine meant top speed only. Unless I read that wrong too.
If i'm taking it literally from a grammatical standpoint, if the magazine only meant the top speed would be different then they should have said "Figure" for standard turbo, Since they said "Figures" i'd take that as multiple data points would be for the standard turbo version rather than just one.
I'd just say that as neither your or my opinion can be proved correct then this article can't be confirmed to be accurate for the car in question in the game.
So now we are doing changes for balancing sake, huh? Because last time i checked, this car's performance in game perfectly matched real life. Spot-on acceleration times.
Man these hutch guys really are not car guys. Nearly identical weight cars. The 24 has dramatically more torque and power with the newer better chassis. It is asinine they get these MRA things wrong on the front end then it takes a year to correct it.
Man these hutch guys really are not car guys. Nearly identical weight cars. The 24 has dramatically more torque and power with the newer better chassis. It is asinine they get these MRA things wrong on the front end then it takes a year to correct it.
We only got Bentley in late January, so it's only been just under 7 months. Also, this is a "result you don't like" and not an MRA fix. Please keep this thread on track.
Man these hutch guys really are not car guys. Nearly identical weight cars. The 24 has dramatically more torque and power with the newer better chassis. It is asinine they get these MRA things wrong on the front end then it takes a year to correct it.
We only got Bentley in late January, so it's only been just under 7 months. Also, this is a "result you don't like" and not an MRA fix. Please keep this thread on track.
Wrong. It is years of building and tuning cars that clearly show the MRA is wrong. It is wrong. The dramatically less powerful car will not win in any scenario with similar weighs and chassis. It's like you guys have zero clue about cars.
Maxed A cars should be much lighter than your 24. Please post these in “Unbelievable Results” if you think these are unbelievable, we only talks about real tests about acceleration here.
Man these hutch guys really are not car guys. Nearly identical weight cars. The 24 has dramatically more torque and power with the newer better chassis. It is asinine they get these MRA things wrong on the front end then it takes a year to correct it.
We only got Bentley in late January, so it's only been just under 7 months. Also, this is a "result you don't like" and not an MRA fix. Please keep this thread on track.
Wrong. It is years of building and tuning cars that clearly show the MRA is wrong. It is wrong. The dramatically less powerful car will not win in any scenario with similar weighs and chassis. It's like you guys have zero clue about cars.
What part of "You're going off topic" did you fail to comprehend?
Man these hutch guys really are not car guys. Nearly identical weight cars. The 24 has dramatically more torque and power with the newer better chassis. It is asinine they get these MRA things wrong on the front end then it takes a year to correct it.
We only got Bentley in late January, so it's only been just under 7 months. Also, this is a "result you don't like" and not an MRA fix. Please keep this thread on track.
Wrong. It is years of building and tuning cars that clearly show the MRA is wrong. It is wrong. The dramatically less powerful car will not win in any scenario with similar weighs and chassis. It's like you guys have zero clue about cars.
What do weight and chassis have to do with MRA engine data? Regardless, you didn’t lose because of real world stats. You lost because of game mechanics; specifically engine-upgrade-traction-bonus.
Comments
What are you guys complaining about?
Also please don't bump it to leggie just yet I haven't even pulled my first Furai >_<
-It should be slightly slower.
I guess the data for this car is kinda rare.
But luckily our Japanese buddy have did a 1/4 mile test on it.
1/4 mile: 14.13 -> 14.44
Source:
hopefully that will bump it down to super rare, i will no longer have the fear of getting it in my carbons
0-100 mph time should be improved, as 0-60 mph time is correct. MRA should improve from ~61 to 68.35
0-60 should be lowered from 3.5 to 3.4 and MRA should go up from 98 to exactly 100
https://www.automobile-catalog.com/car/2013/1817855/mercedes-benz_sls_amg_coupe_black_series.html
And you clearly didn't read the announcement, either.
0-100mph: 8:60 -> 8:90, thus MRA: 82.98 -> 78.00
0-150: 22:91 -> 20:7
https://www.flickr.com/photos/triggerscarstuff/sets/72157615401242669/with/3363141808/
0-100 mph: 17.6 sec -> 18.9 sec
From MOTOR Magazine, 1985 August 3rd: https://www.flickr.com/photos/triggerscarstuff/albums/72157630080215862
If i'm taking it literally from a grammatical standpoint, if the magazine only meant the top speed would be different then they should have said "Figure" for standard turbo, Since they said "Figures" i'd take that as multiple data points would be for the standard turbo version rather than just one.
I'd just say that as neither your or my opinion can be proved correct then this article can't be confirmed to be accurate for the car in question in the game.
So now we are doing changes for balancing sake, huh? Because last time i checked, this car's performance in game perfectly matched real life. Spot-on acceleration times.
Absolutely wrong.