I'd assume the race info says "better MRA/Lower Mass" so he thought to post here.
The 24 actually has more MRA and power than the other 2. Weight is similar too when the cars are stock,but the 24 is a one star where the other 2 are maxed so definitely a weight difference there.
Slalom and G-force tests aren't a one dimensional grip test. Mass and width also plays a part in the race. Results are as expected.
I'd assume the race info says "better MRA/Lower Mass" so he thought to post here.
That’s all fine and dandy. I get that. I asked to please keep it on track and post in the correct thread, then they get pissy and tell me we don’t know what we’re doing. 🤷♂️
I'd assume the race info says "better MRA/Lower Mass" so he thought to post here.
That’s all fine and dandy. I get that. I asked to please keep it on track and post in the correct thread, then they get pissy and tell me we don’t know what we’re doing. 🤷♂️
History shows someone making decisions ( 5 seat Bentley race car, 2010 Gallardo Spyder a half second slower than 2009, BTR2 faster than CTR2 just off top of my head) does not know what they are doing.
the 208 pikes peak should have slick tyres as it was built for a asphalt road, same with the vw idr.
208 wrx all surface tyres, rallycross asphalt and gravel
peugeot rallycars need different tyres as they never use slicks in real life
the 208 pikes peak should have slick tyres as it was built for a asphalt road, same with the vw idr.
208 wrx all surface tyres, rallycross asphalt and gravel
peugeot rallycars need different tyres as they never use slicks in real life
This is not MRA related, which is solely related to acceleration. Each of these suggestions should be it's own separate thread in the Corrections forum (if a thread about that car doesn't already exist and can be added to), along with proper proof to back up the suggestion. Without factual proof, it will not be addressed. Thank you for your understanding.
I'd assume the race info says "better MRA/Lower Mass" so he thought to post here.
That’s all fine and dandy. I get that. I asked to please keep it on track and post in the correct thread, then they get pissy and tell me we don’t know what we’re doing. 🤷♂️
History shows someone making decisions ( 5 seat Bentley race car, 2010 Gallardo Spyder a half second slower than 2009, BTR2 faster than CTR2 just off top of my head) does not know what they are doing.
But the 2009 Gallardo Spyder has a midrange like a Birkenstock.
Comments
Slalom and G-force tests aren't a one dimensional grip test. Mass and width also plays a part in the race. Results are as expected.
Hutch: *corrects 400 cars
Players: "Hutch ruined my garage!"
Hutch: 🤷♂️
When btr2 is now beaten by btr ? No way
From Autocar issue of July '92: https://www.flickr.com/photos/triggerscarstuff/albums/72157629882070186
0-60 mph: 5.5 sec -> 6.0 sec
0-100 mph: 15.10 sec -> 15.8 sec
0-120 mph: 25.36 sec -> 25.2 sec
0-130 mph: ~33.26 sec -> 30.9 sec
1/4 mile time: 14.28 sec @ 98 mph -> 14.6 sec @ 96 mph
so basically the mid-range is improved from 57.29 to 61.22.
From MOTOR magazine issue of 1980: https://www.flickr.com/photos/triggerscarstuff/albums/72157625180659033
0-60 mph: 9.5 sec -> 9.9 sec
0-100 mph: 26.15 sec -> 32.0 sec
mid-range decreased from 57.06 to 44.80.
From CAR magazine issue of Sep '87: https://www.flickr.com/photos/triggerscarstuff/albums/72157623454417252
0-100 and 1/4 mile times are correct, no change needed.
0-125 mph: ~13.44 sec -> 12.8 sec
two screenshots because we still can’t compate cars