Decent pulls... All my S and A recent pulls

1545557596082

Comments

  • starpino77starpino77 Posts: 46 ✭✭
    I've found this monster. Any idea how to max?

  • AntounAntoun Posts: 1,156 ✭✭✭✭✭
    I've found this monster. Any idea how to max?

    I would go 303, but try to test MRA before finishing it this way.
  • grandvachegrandvache Posts: 1,978 ✭✭✭✭✭
    This from German premiums made me happy enough ($1.5)

    This from a ceramic made me ecstatic!


    I'm also thinking that the i8 should be on STD tyres as it runs eco-rubber.  I can't find the actual OEM tyres, does anyone know?  It would be a beast in the rain if it was.
  • starpino77starpino77 Posts: 46 ✭✭
    Antoun said:
    I've found this monster. Any idea how to max?

    I would go 303, but try to test MRA before finishing it this way.
    Updated 2.3 2.0 2.3 does 0-100 in 7.79s.
  • S3XYS3XY Posts: 327 ✭✭✭✭

    mra 71.4
  • NinjaDesignzNinjaDesignz Posts: 2,155 ✭✭✭✭✭
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    Soooo it's basically a potato 
  • S3XYS3XY Posts: 327 ✭✭✭✭
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    Soooo it's basically a potato 
    Yeah. rq27 might be accurate to describe how bad it is.
    The only use of this car I can imagine is to scare opponents away, but it needs to be accompanied by some other Legendaries.
  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Posts: 264 ✭✭✭
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
  • DING097DING097 Posts: 46 ✭✭
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
  • lg29lg29 Posts: 699 ✭✭✭✭
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

  • TD42792TD42792 Posts: 1,719 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph
  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Posts: 264 ✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
  • TD42792TD42792 Posts: 1,719 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 26
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Posts: 2,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
  • bluedogsnoopbluedogsnoop Posts: 592 ✭✭✭✭✭
    LittleEnosBurdette said

    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
    Yes
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Posts: 2,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Got it then. 👍🏻
  • BoxtaSBoxtaS Posts: 1,540 ✭✭✭✭✭
    What is the Twizy’s MRA? Zero? 
    Or infinity? 
  • evilprofesseurevilprofesseur Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
    ..you're not talking about the BTR anymore, right? It can't possibly make the 0-100 in 6s, even when maxed, can it?
  • LittleEnosBurdetteLittleEnosBurdette Posts: 2,849 ✭✭✭✭✭
    TD42792 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    TD42792 said:
    lg29 said:
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37
    If this formula is reliable then the MRA for the RUF BTR should be around 107. Which is insane for a B-Class car with these kind of stats:

    You might be doing it in kmh? I got to 81.13 doing it with mph

    How can he do it in kmh? The acceleration on the card is in mph and also the track is 0-100mph so he cant get a kmh outcome cause all the variables are in mph.
    Correct me please.
    I dont know, that’s the only explanation I could think of, maybe he converted it!?
    So if it’s 0-60 is 3.1 and it’s 6.0 to 100 is it's MRA 106.89? Maths was never my strong point. 
    ..you're not talking about the BTR anymore, right? It can't possibly make the 0-100 in 6s, even when maxed, can it?
    Sorry no I wasn’t, was just checking how it was done. 


  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Posts: 264 ✭✭✭
    edited June 27
    DING097 said:
    Anzatoro said:
    S3XY said:

    mra 71.4
    I m sorry to ask this maybe a dumb question, but how do you calculate the MRA?
    100 * (acc0_60 / (acc0_100 - acc0_60)) so if your car's 0-60 is 3.8 and the 0-100 is 9.2 you can calculate it with this formula 100*(3.8/(9.2-3.8))=70.37 which means your car's MRA is 70.37

    Oh oh i just found maybe a flaw in this formula?

    How can you multiply and divide decimal numbers with non-decimal time numbers (seconds in particular)? When you multiply or divide the outcome you get is always decimal.

    I really dont get it, so the MRA value is just a vague number that shows the power of the car from 60-100mph? Cause its sure not seconds.

    Because when you divide lets say 500 with 6.50seconds the outcome is what? If you do this on a calculator it will take 6.50 as SIX POINT FIVE which is 6 and a half. But this is not the case cause 6.50 is 6 seconds and 50 tenths of second...
  • RWareRWare Posts: 772 ✭✭✭✭
    Sorry, I may have misunderstood, but 6.50 seconds is 6 and a half.

    5 tenths of a second is .5, which is half, right?
  • AnzatoroAnzatoro Posts: 264 ✭✭✭
    RWare said:
    Sorry, I may have misunderstood, but 6.50 seconds is 6 and a half.

    5 tenths of a second is .5, which is half, right?
    Ohhh you are absolutely right, it is indeed because its a tenth!
    I was totally confused because time is not measured in decimals from minutes and up, but it is measured in decimals on seconds and below.

    So you actually can multiply 100*6.3 seconds or divide 500/6.2.
  • evilprofesseurevilprofesseur Posts: 1,436 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Anzatoro said:
    RWare said:
    Sorry, I may have misunderstood, but 6.50 seconds is 6 and a half.

    5 tenths of a second is .5, which is half, right?
    Ohhh you are absolutely right, it is indeed because its a tenth!
    I was totally confused because time is not measured in decimals from minutes and up, but it is measured in decimals on seconds and below.

    So you actually can multiply 100*6.3 seconds or divide 500/6.2.
    Using this definition mra is a unitless value
  • bantel_catbantel_cat Posts: 895 ✭✭✭✭✭
    Not a bad duplicate legendary, better than my other duplicate the SLS electric 

    Nice, never pulled any GT.
    My only duplicate Legendary? Merc SLS....  Ha ha ha ha ha... Sob
  • lemmings99olemmings99o Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited June 27
    Not a bad duplicate legendary, better than my other duplicate the SLS electric 

    Nice, never pulled any GT.
    My only duplicate Legendary? Merc SLS....  Ha ha ha ha ha... Sob
    The SLS electric was my first duplicate, got some use out of it in a merc event a while back
  • DannyDanny Posts: 608 ✭✭✭✭
    binner said:


    Timely pull from my Austin challenge cf
    Very nice. I’ll just settle for my amazing rq19 🤨
Sign In or Register to comment.