Everyone accepts that mistakes happen, but seriously why can’t they learn not to use bugged cars as requirements until the mistakes have been corrected?
Everyone accepts that mistakes happen, but seriously why can’t they learn not to use bugged cars as requirements until the mistakes have been corrected?
Because they are planed months ahead. Would take a lot of work to reschedule everything 😅
I would add, if events are planned months before and 22 updates have been released this year ( @Hutch_Robin ) why Bentley seats count hadn't been corrected ?
I would add, if events are planned months before and 22 updates have been released this year ( @Hutch_Robin ) why Bentley seats count hadn't been corrected ?
Bentleys are in the change list for the future update... as to why it wasn't fixed earlier - I don't know.
I would add, if events are planned months before and 22 updates have been released this year ( @Hutch_Robin ) why Bentley seats count hadn't been corrected ?
Bentleys are in the change list for the future update... as to why it wasn't fixed earlier - I don't know.
Ok, So... You can admit having this event BEFORE this future update is a mistake ?
I would add, if events are planned months before and 22 updates have been released this year ( @Hutch_Robin ) why Bentley seats count hadn't been corrected ?
Bentleys are in the change list for the future update... as to why it wasn't fixed earlier - I don't know.
Thank for the reply. Perhaps for future significant events, look at the change list beforehand?
What about this event - will you just let people with these cars exploit this mistake?
Also, can you tell us what these CFs are? Rwd German convertibles or just German?
I would add, if events are planned months before and 22 updates have been released this year ( @Hutch_Robin ) why Bentley seats count hadn't been corrected ?
Bentleys are in the change list for the future update... as to why it wasn't fixed earlier - I don't know.
i think it's a easy fix.. you can change in one day this bug!! But it's business.. so you wait months for this change... nice work.. as always!!!
We have to have in mind that every car stat correction needs a client update. That, and the fact that are things about gameply more important to get fixed sooner, it's not surprise that they didn't released an update of this type. They first gather all the things they can fix, they fix them, and finally they release the client update. Don't loose your minds and try to be comprehensive. Fix are gonna come and the game will get better with time. Let's try reducing the negativity in the forum, shall we?
As for the qualifiers, they could have used other requirements knowing the issue, but it's already done. Try and error!
I would add, if events are planned months before and 22 updates have been released this year ( @Hutch_Robin ) why Bentley seats count hadn't been corrected ?
Bentleys are in the change list for the future update... as to why it wasn't fixed earlier - I don't know.
i think it's a easy fix.. you can change in one day this bug!! But it's business.. so you wait months for this change... nice work.. as always!!!
I mean wouldn't make sense for Hutch to do this though. If they were going to change the GT3's seat count (which they will), it'll coincide with other cars. As for qualifs they should've added a no slick car req to block the GT3 from being used, but its too late for that to happen.
We have to have in mind that every car stat correction needs a client update. That, and the fact that are things about gameply more important to get fixed sooner, it's not surprise that they didn't released an update of this type. They first gather all the things they can fix, they fix them, and finally they release the client update. Don't loose your minds and try to be comprehensive. Fix are gonna come and the game will get better with time. Let's try reducing the negativity in the forum, shall we?
As for the qualifiers, they could have used other requirements knowing the issue, but it's already done. Try and error!
In theory I would agree with your reasonable view.
But there has been at least 2 client updates since this super easy to fix blatant mistake has been reported. No compassion from me. They need to up their game big time. Hutch sells an expensive product but it is full of defects, not acceptable. And that’s my view as a (mostly) F2P. If I were P2W I would be up in arms.
This game is by far more expensive than any AAA videogame, play two finals or buy yourself a Playstation 4.
Its a shame that we play all this in a known bugged state and no one at Hutch really seems to care. @LittleEnosBurdette time to fight for the Subaru pic!
Yep, it is OK to not solve all the cars errors, (some are so small, who care)
But using allowing to use this car, already flagged during another event is just no respectful.
To centerback to the road map. At the end, I understand this Hutch choice to move the way they imagine the best for they game. We are all here because we liked the idea and the concept.
However, I think it is important to build a strong community (Hutch_Dmitri is doing a huge job) and listen to the feedback of users. I am not sure if you seen the last two pokémon communication? They present 3 meeh games on mobile and say that they have a big announcement for next week. They managed to get the hype very high! Just to present another mobile games with Tencent. All occidental players are angry, because they were teased and hyped. But they were hoping for something which they want for 5 years. All asian players are angry because of the partner (Tencent seems to be aggressive on the P2w)
The Pokémon company managed to get 160k dislikes (they deleted some even)
More and more company seems to not car what the fan base want, and just broaden their scope. (pokémon moba is to have more Chinese people I guess, but even Chinese don't like the game...) -> point is, don't loose yourself in the pursuit of broadening your scope, you may not conquer the new players, and lost the old one.
Also, for the new feature, we can view the past of YouTube Rewind. They were cool, and some people got the brillant idea to evolve things... Most disliked videos on YouTube! Coming from YouTube (kind of comic) -> point is, sometimes simplicity is key. New players can jump in directly, old players can master the smallest trick.
I am 27, engineer (perfect milenial kind of) and I feel like, I am less and less the target of big companies. Even If I was born with the beginning of video games.
What is your target? My grand parents? Or teenage who don't earn money?
And i don't understand why companies don't want to listen to their Fanbase. Some trick are simple.
@Hutch_Dmitri, I understand that the forum does not have a lot of users, if you speak French or someone's from Hutch who speak French want to join the French group on Facebook, you will have even more feedback (more or less the same than the forum)
I empathize with Hutch wanting to give endgame players something else to strive for (tuner parts). But as others have expressed, I think adding another layer to the upgrading system is a step too far. As @HeissRod mentioned, tuning makes it more difficult to quickly determine which car can be beaten where - something of utmost importance in the last few minutes of a prize car final. And let’s not kid ourselves here, the physics of the game isn’t exactly top notch. Adding more variables to an already imperfect system won’t make the physics easier to understand or any more likely to yield correct results. Again, echoing others, I feel like tuning strays too far from the card-collecting nature of the game. By all means, bring on tuners as their own manufacturers, but tuning parts themselves I’m not enthusiastic about.
I look forward to quality of life improvements. More championships. More challenge series arcs. More big tri(or penta)-series that break the mold. UI improvements and general polish. Physics engine improvements. Flexible criteria (although I do fear the massive increase in granularity this will bring and the necessity to CF hunt for that one car that fits the criteria perfectly but isn’t worth keeping otherwise).
I think the game is in a good place to some degree. Yes, there are things that need fixing, and I’m confident they’re being worked on. You mention trying to retain old players and attract new ones. I think older endgame players would much prefer quality of life fixes and some UI polish over another step down the rabbit hole in the form of tuning parts. And on the topic of new players, do they really need something else to try and grasp? The tuning system in place now is simple enough yet can be complex (see unbelievable results thread) - don’t drive them away by making it harder to understand.
Hey guys, thanks for your feedback on the Roadmap update by Robin, I just wanted to ask if you could kindly keep the discussion in this thread specifically to the topic in question, which is the Roadmap and the future features of Top Drives. I've seen some unrelated comments about packs and cars for qualifiers (and other topics) here which makes it a bit hard for us to read through your feedback. You can always discuss these things in relevant topics.
Hey guys, thanks for your feedback on the Roadmap update by Robin, I just wanted to ask if you could kindly keep the discussion in this thread specifically to the topic in question, which is the Roadmap and the future features of Top Drives. I've seen some unrelated comments about packs and cars for qualifiers (and other topics) here which makes it a bit hard for us to read through your feedback. You can always discuss these things in relevant topics.
Thanks, we really appreciate your input!
the problem is the roadmap.. maybe you need to put bug fix first priority for this game and no new feature like retuning...
Hutch wants to add tuning to this game but can't even get a racecar to have a proper number of seats
Maybe this is already a tuned up version, take the whole family to the racetrack
Yeah we took out the roll cage and added a bench seat. The whole family is having a lovely time around North Loop, but I'm a little mad about some old 90s Supercar beating my lap time...
The only reason Hutch wants to tune existing cars is that there are a lot of maxed cars by now and they are worthless for Hutch. Tuning them is like taking away the updates. Instead of releasing 400 new cars they have all the existing cars back in business. Great thinking by Hutch, but I don’t like it. As already said above,.. I like this game as a card-unpacking game. I don’t want to unpack a spoiler or a Pirelli tyre.
Comments
if events are planned months before and 22 updates have been released this year ( @Hutch_Robin )
why Bentley seats count hadn't been corrected ?
What about this event - will you just let people with these cars exploit this mistake?
Also, can you tell us what these CFs are? Rwd German convertibles or just German?
To put so many other things higher up on the agenda is ridiculous, to me.
i think it's a easy fix.. you can change in one day this bug!! But it's business.. so you wait months for this change... nice work.. as always!!!
As for the qualifiers, they could have used other requirements knowing the issue, but it's already done. Try and error!
No compassion from me. They need to up their game big time. Hutch sells an expensive product but it is full of defects, not acceptable.
And that’s my view as a (mostly) F2P. If I were P2W I would be up in arms.
@LittleEnosBurdette time to fight for the Subaru pic!
But using allowing to use this car, already flagged during another event is just no respectful.
To centerback to the road map.
At the end, I understand this Hutch choice to move the way they imagine the best for they game. We are all here because we liked the idea and the concept.
However, I think it is important to build a strong community (Hutch_Dmitri is doing a huge job) and listen to the feedback of users.
I am not sure if you seen the last two pokémon communication? They present 3 meeh games on mobile and say that they have a big announcement for next week. They managed to get the hype very high! Just to present another mobile games with Tencent. All occidental players are angry, because they were teased and hyped. But they were hoping for something which they want for 5 years. All asian players are angry because of the partner (Tencent seems to be aggressive on the P2w)
The Pokémon company managed to get 160k dislikes (they deleted some even)
More and more company seems to not car what the fan base want, and just broaden their scope. (pokémon moba is to have more Chinese people I guess, but even Chinese don't like the game...)
-> point is, don't loose yourself in the pursuit of broadening your scope, you may not conquer the new players, and lost the old one.
Also, for the new feature, we can view the past of YouTube Rewind. They were cool, and some people got the brillant idea to evolve things... Most disliked videos on YouTube! Coming from YouTube (kind of comic)
-> point is, sometimes simplicity is key. New players can jump in directly, old players can master the smallest trick.
I am 27, engineer (perfect milenial kind of) and I feel like, I am less and less the target of big companies.
Even If I was born with the beginning of video games.
What is your target? My grand parents? Or teenage who don't earn money?
And i don't understand why companies don't want to listen to their Fanbase. Some trick are simple.
@Hutch_Dmitri, I understand that the forum does not have a lot of users, if you speak French or someone's from Hutch who speak French want to join the French group on Facebook, you will have even more feedback (more or less the same than the forum)
Sorry for the long rant 😱
Thanks, we really appreciate your input!
the problem is the roadmap.. maybe you need to put bug fix first priority for this game and no new feature like retuning...
Reference: June Q&A